Christian, <div><br></div><div>If I understand it right, Sune asks for consistency in the person templates. In this case it means to convert all the person templates to this form:</div><div><br></div><div><div style><div>Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University </div>
<div> Faculty of Economics</div><div>Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby</div><div>Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic &amp; Political Studies (IISEPS)</div><div>Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby</div>
<div><br></div><div>(with optional Workplace-Share)</div><div><br></div><div>Sune, is this correct?</div><div><br></div><div>If yes, then this shouldn&#39;t require Christian to do any reversal work.</div><div><br></div><div>
-i</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Christian Zimmermann <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:zimmermann@stlouisfed.org">zimmermann@stlouisfed.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">My time is scarce but not as expensive as I&#39;d like. Never the less, it would be really good to have the templates regenerated. Fixing the bugs in the system must, of course, have priority. But after that, please!<br>

<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
There are competing interests. I have adapted my code and would have to readapt for a reversal (one cannot completely roll back, as the workplace shares and deceased fields are new anyway).<div class="im HOEnZb"><br></div>
</blockquote></div></div>