Sune and all,
I am not entierly happy about the way this is done. It would have been good with some advance notice before an incompatible change is made to ReDIF.
While the changes to RAS has been discussed (I believe only on RAS-RUN) I can find no discussion of the changes to ReDIF.
To make things worse we now have two different file formats in play at the same time. When will the conversion to the new format be complete?
I don't like the arrows in Workplace-Name.
/Sune
Ivan Kurmanov skrev 2012-02-28 17:13:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Ivan Kurmanov* <duraley@gmail.com <mailto:duraley@gmail.com>>
Date: Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
To: the gory details of RePEc <repec-run@lists.openlib.org<mailto:repec-run@lists.openlib.org>>
Sorry, the higher-share affiliation would come first, actually. So, it
may rather be like this after the upgrade:
Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
→ Faculty of Economics
Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
Workplace-Share: 70
Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political
Studies (IISEPS)
Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
Workplace-Share: 30
-i
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com<mailto:duraley@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have been reviewing past mail from myself, trying to find if i
have warned you, guys, about a change in person templates that is
going to happen. And I can't find it, so maybe it is just in my head.
The affiliation data in the template may look like this:
Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:febsuby
Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:iisepby
But after the forthcomming upgrade, it would soon start looking as:
Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
→ Faculty of Economics
Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
Workplace-Share: 30
Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political
Studies (IISEPS)
Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
Workplace-Share: 70
This is a change that may require adaptation on your side.
Every ReDIF template generated after the upgrade will be formatted
in the new way. Please let us know if this is a serious issue and if
we should postpone the upgrade.
-ivan
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Christian Zimmermann<zimmermann@stlouisfed.org <mailto:zimmermann@stlouisfed.org>> wrote:_________________________________________________
The RePEc Author Service will soon start disseminating person
templates with new fields (Deceased, Workplace-Share). Make sure
you have the redif.spec file dated 2011-11-10, distributed in
ReDIF-perl version 2.66, in place, or the new templates will be
rejected.
--
Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
RePEc-run mailing list
RePEc-run@lists.openlib.org <mailto:RePEc-run@lists.openlib.org>
http://lists.openlib.org/__mailman/listinfo/repec-run
<http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/repec-run>
_______________________________________________
RAS-run mailing list
RAS-run@lists.openlib.org
http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
Handelshögskolan/Örebro University School of Business
--
Sune Karlsson
Professor of Statisticshttp://www.oru.se/hh/sune_karlsson
Dekanus/Dean Fakulteten för ekonomi-, natur- och teknikvetenskap
Örebro University, SE-70182 Örebro, Sweden
Phone +46 19 301257/301415
http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pka1.htm