'Christian Zimmermann' writes
OK. But the learning on ACIS tries to separate Economics (say) from not Economics.
Yes, but it can also separate various areas of economocs, or different names of co-authors.
Here everything is Economics. Does that mean the threshold should be set much stricter to put good matches in yes?
I don't know. It depends on the risk you want to take of false positives and false negatives. Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Thomas Krichel wrote:
'Christian Zimmermann' writes
OK. But the learning on ACIS tries to separate Economics (say) from not Economics.
Yes, but it can also separate various areas of economocs, or different names of co-authors.
Here everything is Economics. Does that mean the threshold should be set much stricter to put good matches in yes?
I don't know. It depends on the risk you want to take of false positives and false negatives.
I guess we'll see from experience. Let's have rather strict for starters. Right now it is much too lax, as *everything* passes as 'yes'.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
-- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
'Christian Zimmermann' writes
I guess we'll see from experience. Let's have rather strict for starters.
The parameter couple can enforce that. Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
participants (2)
-
'Christian Zimmermann' -
Thomas Krichel