Chirag Anand writes
Hi Thomas, if possible, can you please take out some time to give us a few deliverables with tentative deadlines or perhaps time required for them? We are in a bit of hurry to finish this contract as the year is ending.
I have been working an a draft, on a day when I had no Internet, and I made good progress. Setting deadlines will be difficult though. Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
On 26 December 2012 19:01, Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org> wrote:
Chirag Anand writes
Hi Thomas, if possible, can you please take out some time to give us a few deliverables with tentative deadlines or perhaps time required for them? We are in a bit of hurry to finish this contract as the year is ending.
I have been working an a draft, on a day when I had no Internet, and I made good progress. Setting deadlines will be difficult though.
We are not looking at hard deadlines, but say give us a list of deliverables for the next 3-6 months as of now. That would do. Thanks. -- Chirag Anand http://atvariance.in
Chirag Anand writes
We are not looking at hard deadlines, but say give us a list of deliverables for the next 3-6 months as of now. That would do.
I am working on a plan, and then rethinking things and tossinng things around. but I got until starting to put somthing into HTML. http://openlib.org/home/krichel/work/fort_lee.html This looks now much easier than the ideas I had two days ago. I will do some more work on this tomorrow, as I will spend much of the day offline. Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
On 28 December 2012 11:15, Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org> wrote:
Chirag Anand writes
We are not looking at hard deadlines, but say give us a list of deliverables for the next 3-6 months as of now. That would do.
I am working on a plan, and then rethinking things and tossinng things around. but I got until starting to put somthing into HTML.
http://openlib.org/home/krichel/work/fort_lee.html
This looks now much easier than the ideas I had two days ago. I will do some more work on this tomorrow, as I will spend much of the day offline.
Okay that's great. I will extract something out of the current version for contracting as of now. Will modify accordingly as when you change the document. Thanks. -- Chirag Anand http://atvariance.in
I think I have a first version of a document that can be seen as a first stab for the first phase. There is also a plan, and a start of an implementation for a zeroth phase, the one that stores ReDIF templates. All this is linked to from the project homepage http://archec.repec.org Bug reports and other comments welcome. I want to talk to Rishabh about this asap before I forget it all again. Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
Hi Thomas, I went through the FortLee document, and extracted out the major goals of the project, and put them in the contracting terms. As far as we are concerned, this will do for the next 6 months, but in the long term we would have to come up with some thing other than the current terms. Please take a look at it, and suggest whether we should change anything there. Thanks. On 28 December 2012 11:22, Chirag Anand <anand.chirag@gmail.com> wrote:
On 28 December 2012 11:15, Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org> wrote:
Chirag Anand writes
We are not looking at hard deadlines, but say give us a list of deliverables for the next 3-6 months as of now. That would do.
I am working on a plan, and then rethinking things and tossinng things around. but I got until starting to put somthing into HTML.
http://openlib.org/home/krichel/work/fort_lee.html
This looks now much easier than the ideas I had two days ago. I will do some more work on this tomorrow, as I will spend much of the day offline.
Okay that's great. I will extract something out of the current version for contracting as of now. Will modify accordingly as when you change the document.
Thanks.
-- Chirag Anand http://atvariance.in
-- Chirag Anand http://atvariance.in
Hi, did you get time to take a look at the terms? Can we finalise these? Thanks. On 31 December 2012 15:16, Chirag Anand <anand.chirag@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I went through the FortLee document, and extracted out the major goals of the project, and put them in the contracting terms. As far as we are concerned, this will do for the next 6 months, but in the long term we would have to come up with some thing other than the current terms. Please take a look at it, and suggest whether we should change anything there.
Thanks.
On 28 December 2012 11:22, Chirag Anand <anand.chirag@gmail.com> wrote:
On 28 December 2012 11:15, Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org> wrote:
Chirag Anand writes
We are not looking at hard deadlines, but say give us a list of deliverables for the next 3-6 months as of now. That would do.
I am working on a plan, and then rethinking things and tossinng things around. but I got until starting to put somthing into HTML.
http://openlib.org/home/krichel/work/fort_lee.html
This looks now much easier than the ideas I had two days ago. I will do some more work on this tomorrow, as I will spend much of the day offline.
Okay that's great. I will extract something out of the current version for contracting as of now. Will modify accordingly as when you change the document.
Thanks.
-- Chirag Anand http://atvariance.in
-- Chirag Anand http://atvariance.in
-- Chirag Anand http://atvariance.in
Chirag Anand writes
I went through the FortLee document, and extracted out the major goals of the project, and put them in the contracting terms. As far as we are concerned, this will do for the next 6 months, but in the long term we would have to come up with some thing other than the current terms. Please take a look at it, and suggest whether we should change anything there.
No these terms look good. As I see it we have a first phase where we store tobis, then we store fobis. There are minor differences, but both use the objcet store, so part of the code on templates can be recycled from tobi to fobis. These are the file paths and the lookup database. At a second disucession on Skype, Rishab seemed to experience problems with the concepts on fobi and tobis, the handles and time. I revised the Fort Lee paper http://openlib.org/home/krichel/work/fort_lee.html in the hope to make this clearer. Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
Hi Thomas, thanks for confirming the terms, I will forward them to the administration and get the contract done as soon as possible. Thanks. On 10 January 2013 12:55, Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org> wrote:
Chirag Anand writes
I went through the FortLee document, and extracted out the major goals of the project, and put them in the contracting terms. As far as we are concerned, this will do for the next 6 months, but in the long term we would have to come up with some thing other than the current terms. Please take a look at it, and suggest whether we should change anything there.
No these terms look good. As I see it we have a first phase where we store tobis, then we store fobis. There are minor differences, but both use the objcet store, so part of the code on templates can be recycled from tobi to fobis. These are the file paths and the lookup database.
At a second disucession on Skype, Rishab seemed to experience problems with the concepts on fobi and tobis, the handles and time. I revised the Fort Lee paper
http://openlib.org/home/krichel/work/fort_lee.html
in the hope to make this clearer.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
-- Chirag Anand http://atvariance.in
participants (2)
-
Chirag Anand -
Thomas Krichel