The problematic template is repec:hem:wpaper:0702. It was not read. Let's try again by specifying the template file.
What is the problem here? The template can not be read?
aras@nebka:~/acis/RI$ updareq RePEc hem/wpaper/62828.rdf
...
Thu Aug 20 10:18:17 2009 + Update request for a file in directory: '62828.rdf' in 'hem/wpaper/' Thu Aug 20 10:18:17 2009 + the directory is in the db Thu Aug 20 10:18:17 2009 * [12484] finished update session, timestamp: 1250777897 aras@nebka:~/acis/RI$ aras@nebka:~/acis/RI$ tail -100 update_ch0.log U DATAFILE_START: hem/wpaper/64132.rdf RECORD PROCESS: repec:hem:wpaper:0704|ReDIF-Paper 1.0 RECORD OLD: repec:hem:wpaper:0704 U DATAFILE_FINISH: hem/wpaper/64132.rdf U DATAFILE_START: hem/wpaper/64133.rdf RECORD PROCESS: repec:hem:wpaper:0801|ReDIF-Paper 1.0 RECORD OLD: repec:hem:wpaper:0801 U DATAFILE_FINISH: hem/wpaper/64133.rdf U DATAFILE_START: hem/wpaper/63008.rdf RECORD PROCESS: repec:hem:wpaper:0703|ReDIF-Paper 1.0 RECORD OLD: repec:hem:wpaper:0703 U DATAFILE_FINISH: hem/wpaper/63008.rdf U DATAFILE_START: hem/wpaper/70700.rdf RECORD PROCESS: repec:hem:wpaper:0802|ReDIF-Paper 1.0 RECORD OLD: repec:hem:wpaper:0802 U DATAFILE_FINISH: hem/wpaper/70700.rdf U DATAFILE_START: hem/wpaper/62827.rdf RECORD PROCESS: repec:hem:wpaper:0701|ReDIF-Paper 1.0 RECORD OLD: repec:hem:wpaper:0701 U DATAFILE_FINISH: hem/wpaper/62827.rdf U DATAFILE_START: hem/wpaper/77990.rdf RECORD PROCESS: repec:hem:wpaper:0901|ReDIF-Paper 1.0 RECORD OLD: repec:hem:wpaper:0901 U DATAFILE_FINISH: hem/wpaper/77990.rdf U DATAFILE_START: hem/wpaper/77989.rdf RECORD PROCESS: repec:hem:wpaper:0902|ReDIF-Paper 1.0 RECORD OLD: repec:hem:wpaper:0902 U DATAFILE_FINISH: hem/wpaper/77989.rdf processed 'hem/wpaper/', found: 60371.rdf 70701.rdf 79044.rdf 64132.rdf 62828.rdf 64133.rdf 63008.rdf 70700.rdf 62827.rdf 77990.rdf 77989.rdf U DATAFILE_START: hem/hemarch.rdf file: hem/wpaper/77989.rdf no need to check it to draw conclusions the record is still there
I have never seen the last two lines as a rid message. Where is the record for 62878?
It says there is no need to import it, because it is already there. But it is not. Frustrating.
hmm... Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel skype: thomaskrichel