On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org> wrote:
There are two issues I have with this. The lack of a parameter is one. The other one is Christian's disinterest in learning. He heaps praise on the learning in NEP, but he does not want to have it in RAS. The RAS data has mistakes that the learning will have find and/or prevent. The learning is a a better predictor of relevance that the old full/partial name. But I can't demonstrate these claims.
My issue with learning in ACIS is lack of documentation describing it. If I were to enable it in RAS, I'd be at a loss on what's needed to make it run, and how it has to be configured. Maybe it is documented somewhere, but I missed it? Similarly, your use of sub-project code names, like pitman, cardiff, etc. in ACIS code is a pain for me. Are they explained somewhere? (They are still useful as they are, as they mark related pieces of your code, but they are annoying like signs in a foreign language i don't have a dictionary for.) (And I know you have been frustrated by lack of documentation for my code.) -i