Re: [RAS] [ACIS-tech] Migration Help
Dan, The new machine needs to share the RePEc data files with the Ideas server. Have you done anything for that? Sshfs maybe? Also, did you set up the mailing server there? I'm thinking, maybe we could even do the last checks tomorrow and migrate on Thursday... -ivan On Aug 30, 2011 8:27 PM, "Dan Hayes" <dhayes501@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm fine waiting until Sept 10-11. It will likely take more downtime though, it took quite a while to dump the database (less than an hour though I think), and then it took several hours to transfer it here. Then it took 8+ hours to load it on the machine here.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com> wrote:
It looks like it will take editing /etc/hosts to access the web interface. Set authors.repec.org to 65.89.18.160.
Also, the Affiliations section appears to be working fine now.
I witness.
Which means the Storable strings that were written (with nfreeze) on the old nebka are readable on the new one, and we do not need any other serialization changes at the moment.
Dan, did you measure or record the time it took to restore the database? It took a solid 8 hours. I didn't time it exactly though. I watched the size of /var/lib/mysql and it grew to over 35G, acis is 32G and rdb is 4.2G
Then it looks like we should plan for at least 10-12 hours of downtime of the service for the final migration.
From the point of view of the least user experience damage (and brand damage), it would be great to do the migration over the weekend. But the nearest weekend (3-4 Sep) i'm occupied except at night, when I'd like to have some sleep. The weekend after (10-11 Sep) i'm available.
Or we can ignore the weekends and plan the transition on a business day. I guess Dan will do the large part of the work again, so his availability is key here. I'm pretty flexible at the moment.
And of course, there's more tests and checks to be done.
-i
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com>
wrote:
It took a solid 8 hours. I didn't time it exactly though. I watched
the
size of /var/lib/mysql and it grew to over 35G, acis is 32G and rdb is 4.2G
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com> wrote:
Dan, did you measure or record the time it took to restore the
database?
-ivan
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com>
wrote:
The SQL database has been loaded, and it appears to be running properly. You can test it at 65.89.18.160 or at http://nebka.stlouisfed.org.
Did I not need to run the updareq commands again? It appears to be working without me needing to do anything else.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com> wrote: > > FYI > > I rsynced the files Saturday afternoon, and dumped the sql database > then > as well. I transferred the db backup on Sunday, and I'm now restoring > the > sql databases on the STL server. It looks like its going to take a > while. > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Thomas Krichel < krichel@openlib.org> > wrote: >> >> Dan Hayes writes >> >> > So the reason is that its faster than MySQL for what its being used >> > for? >> >> Yes. At least we think so. >> >> Kindly send me an ssh public key to give you access to the test >> server. >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel >> http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 >> skype: thomaskrichel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ACIS-tech mailing list >> ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org >> http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech >
_______________________________________________ ACIS-tech mailing list ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech
_______________________________________________ ACIS-tech mailing list ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech
_______________________________________________ ACIS-tech mailing list ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech
_______________________________________________ ACIS-tech mailing list ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech
Which directory on the ideas server should be rsynced to which directory on the authors server? And how often should these directories be rsynced? The server is capable of sending mail. Its setup the same as the ideas server. I think it'd be safer to do after the weekend. I also have plans over Aug 3-4, and if we miss anything in setting it up, we'll be canceling plans to work on servers. Is there a reason to rush it? On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com> wrote:
Dan,
The new machine needs to share the RePEc data files with the Ideas server. Have you done anything for that? Sshfs maybe?
Also, did you set up the mailing server there?
I'm thinking, maybe we could even do the last checks tomorrow and migrate on Thursday...
-ivan
On Aug 30, 2011 8:27 PM, "Dan Hayes" <dhayes501@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm fine waiting until Sept 10-11. It will likely take more downtime though, it took quite a while to dump the database (less than an hour though I think), and then it took several hours to transfer it here. Then it took 8+ hours to load it on the machine here.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com> wrote:
It looks like it will take editing /etc/hosts to access the web interface. Set authors.repec.org to 65.89.18.160.
Also, the Affiliations section appears to be working fine now.
I witness.
Which means the Storable strings that were written (with nfreeze) on the old nebka are readable on the new one, and we do not need any other serialization changes at the moment.
Dan, did you measure or record the time it took to restore the database? It took a solid 8 hours. I didn't time it exactly though. I watched the size of /var/lib/mysql and it grew to over 35G, acis is 32G and rdb is 4.2G
Then it looks like we should plan for at least 10-12 hours of downtime of the service for the final migration.
From the point of view of the least user experience damage (and brand damage), it would be great to do the migration over the weekend. But the nearest weekend (3-4 Sep) i'm occupied except at night, when I'd like to have some sleep. The weekend after (10-11 Sep) i'm available.
Or we can ignore the weekends and plan the transition on a business day. I guess Dan will do the large part of the work again, so his availability is key here. I'm pretty flexible at the moment.
And of course, there's more tests and checks to be done.
-i
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com>
wrote:
It took a solid 8 hours. I didn't time it exactly though. I watched
the
size of /var/lib/mysql and it grew to over 35G, acis is 32G and rdb is 4.2G
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com> wrote:
Dan, did you measure or record the time it took to restore the
database?
-ivan
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com>
wrote:
> The SQL database has been loaded, and it appears to be running > properly. > You can test it at 65.89.18.160 or at http://nebka.stlouisfed.org . > > Did I not need to run the updareq commands again? It appears to be > working > without me needing to do anything else. > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> FYI >> >> I rsynced the files Saturday afternoon, and dumped the sql database >> then >> as well. I transferred the db backup on Sunday, and I'm now restoring >> the >> sql databases on the STL server. It looks like its going to take a >> while. >> >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Thomas Krichel < krichel@openlib.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> Dan Hayes writes >>> >>> > So the reason is that its faster than MySQL for what its being used >>> > for? >>> >>> Yes. At least we think so. >>> >>> Kindly send me an ssh public key to give you access to the test >>> server. >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel >>> http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 >>> skype: thomaskrichel >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ACIS-tech mailing list >>> ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org >>> http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech >> > > > _______________________________________________ > ACIS-tech mailing list > ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org > http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech >
_______________________________________________ ACIS-tech mailing list ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech
_______________________________________________ ACIS-tech mailing list ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech
_______________________________________________ ACIS-tech mailing list ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech
_______________________________________________ RAS-run mailing list RAS-run@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
Which directory on the ideas server should be rsynced to which directory on the authors server? And how often should these directories be rsynced?
/home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/
The server is capable of sending mail. Its setup the same as the ideas server.
Hmm. IDEAS should not have mail. Make sure SPF records are there for all aliases.
I think it'd be safer to do after the weekend. I also have plans over Aug 3-4, and if we miss anything in setting it up, we'll be canceling plans to work on servers. Is there a reason to rush it?
Not that it matters, I will be flying all of Sept 3 and have a friend visiting Sept 4-5.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com> wrote:
Dan,
The new machine needs to share the RePEc data files with the Ideas server. Have you done anything for that? Sshfs maybe?
Also, did you set up the mailing server there?
I'm thinking, maybe we could even do the last checks tomorrow and migrate on Thursday...
-ivan
On Aug 30, 2011 8:27 PM, "Dan Hayes" <dhayes501@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm fine waiting until Sept 10-11. It will likely take more downtime though, it took quite a while to dump the database (less than an hour though I think), and then it took several hours to transfer it here. Then it took 8+ hours to load it on the machine here.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com> wrote:
It looks like it will take editing /etc/hosts to access the web interface. Set authors.repec.org to 65.89.18.160.
Also, the Affiliations section appears to be working fine now.
I witness.
Which means the Storable strings that were written (with nfreeze) on the old nebka are readable on the new one, and we do not need any other serialization changes at the moment.
> Dan, did you measure or record the time it took to restore the database? It took a solid 8 hours. I didn't time it exactly though. I watched the size of /var/lib/mysql and it grew to over 35G, acis is 32G and rdb is 4.2G
Then it looks like we should plan for at least 10-12 hours of downtime of the service for the final migration.
From the point of view of the least user experience damage (and brand damage), it would be great to do the migration over the weekend. But the nearest weekend (3-4 Sep) i'm occupied except at night, when I'd like to have some sleep. The weekend after (10-11 Sep) i'm available.
Or we can ignore the weekends and plan the transition on a business day. I guess Dan will do the large part of the work again, so his availability is key here. I'm pretty flexible at the moment.
And of course, there's more tests and checks to be done.
-i
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com>
wrote:
It took a solid 8 hours. I didn't time it exactly though. I watched
the
size of /var/lib/mysql and it grew to over 35G, acis is 32G and rdb is 4.2G
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dan, did you measure or record the time it took to restore the database? > > -ivan > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com> wrote: >> The SQL database has been loaded, and it appears to be running >> properly. >> You can test it at 65.89.18.160 or at http://nebka.stlouisfed.org . >> >> Did I not need to run the updareq commands again? It appears to be >> working >> without me needing to do anything else. >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> FYI >>> >>> I rsynced the files Saturday afternoon, and dumped the sql database >>> then >>> as well. I transferred the db backup on Sunday, and I'm now restoring >>> the >>> sql databases on the STL server. It looks like its going to take a >>> while. >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Thomas Krichel < krichel@openlib.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dan Hayes writes >>>> >>>>> So the reason is that its faster than MySQL for what its being used >>>>> for? >>>> >>>> Yes. At least we think so. >>>> >>>> Kindly send me an ssh public key to give you access to the test >>>> server. >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel >>>> http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 >>>> skype: thomaskrichel >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ACIS-tech mailing list >>>> ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org >>>> http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ACIS-tech mailing list >> ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org >> http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech >> > > _______________________________________________ > ACIS-tech mailing list > ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org > http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech
_______________________________________________ ACIS-tech mailing list ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech
_______________________________________________ ACIS-tech mailing list ACIS-tech@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech
_______________________________________________ RAS-run mailing list RAS-run@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Christian Zimmermann < zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
Which directory on the ideas server should be rsynced to which directory
on the authors server? And how often should these directories be rsynced?
/home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/
It looks like /home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/ contains symbolic links to folders in /home/ftp/pub/RePEc, should I copy over /home/ftp/pub/RePEc/ instead? What should this be synced to on the nebka server?
The server is capable of sending mail. Its setup the same as the ideas server.
Hmm. IDEAS should not have mail. Make sure SPF records are there for all aliases.
All of our servers are capable of sending mail whether they actually do or not. If this is not what you were referring to, then I'm not sure what was meant.
I think it'd be safer to do after the weekend. I also have plans over Aug 3-4, and if we miss anything in setting it up, we'll be canceling plans to work on servers. Is there a reason to rush it?
Not that it matters, I will be flying all of Sept 3 and have a friend visiting Sept 4-5.
I'd think that if nobody is available to fix a potential issue over the weekend, it wouldn't make sense to make a huge change right before the weekend.
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Christian Zimmermann < zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
Which directory on the ideas server should be rsynced to which directory
on the authors server? And how often should these directories be rsynced?
/home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/
It looks like /home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/ contains symbolic links to folders in /home/ftp/pub/RePEc, should I copy over /home/ftp/pub/RePEc/ instead?
You want to copy remo, including contents of symbolic links. There is a corresponding remo directory in the adrepec account.
What should this be synced to on the nebka server?
The server is capable of sending mail. Its setup the same as the ideas server.
Hmm. IDEAS should not have mail. Make sure SPF records are there for all aliases.
All of our servers are capable of sending mail whether they actually do or not. If this is not what you were referring to, then I'm not sure what was meant.
OK. I just do not want unnecessary ports open. I still remember the sendmail hack from Montreal.
I think it'd be safer to do after the weekend. I also have plans over Aug 3-4, and if we miss anything in setting it up, we'll be canceling plans to work on servers. Is there a reason to rush it?
Not that it matters, I will be flying all of Sept 3 and have a friend visiting Sept 4-5.
I'd think that if nobody is available to fix a potential issue over the weekend, it wouldn't make sense to make a huge change right before the weekend.
The server is capable of sending mail. Its setup the same as the ideas
server.
Hmm. IDEAS should not have mail. Make sure SPF records are there for all aliases.
All of our servers are capable of sending mail whether they actually do or not. If this is not what you were referring to, then I'm not sure what was meant.
OK. I just do not want unnecessary ports open. I still remember the sendmail hack from Montreal.
The only ports that will be open to the public are 80 and possibly 443. The firewall (managed by automation) must be configured to let anything else through.
Good point. We had discussions about putting RAS on https. Is that still in the cards? On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
The server is capable of sending mail. Its setup the same as the ideas
server.
Hmm. IDEAS should not have mail. Make sure SPF records are there for all aliases.
All of our servers are capable of sending mail whether they actually do or not. If this is not what you were referring to, then I'm not sure what was meant.
OK. I just do not want unnecessary ports open. I still remember the sendmail hack from Montreal.
The only ports that will be open to the public are 80 and possibly 443. The firewall (managed by automation) must be configured to let anything else through.
That would be a very simple switch once an SSL certificate has been issued. On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Christian Zimmermann < zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
Good point. We had discussions about putting RAS on https. Is that still in the cards?
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
The server is capable of sending mail. Its setup the same as the ideas
server.
Hmm. IDEAS should not have mail. Make sure SPF records are there for all aliases.
All of our servers are capable of sending mail whether they actually do
or not. If this is not what you were referring to, then I'm not sure what was meant.
OK. I just do not want unnecessary ports open. I still remember the sendmail hack from Montreal.
The only ports that will be open to the public are 80 and possibly 443. The firewall (managed by automation) must be configured to let anything else through.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Christian Zimmermann < zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
Which directory on the ideas server should be rsynced to which directory
on the authors server? And how often should these directories be rsynced?
/home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/
It looks like /home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/ contains symbolic links to folders in /home/ftp/pub/RePEc, should I copy over /home/ftp/pub/RePEc/ instead?
You want to copy remo, including contents of symbolic links. There is a corresponding remo directory in the adrepec account.
I've setup "rsync -rLptgoD /home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/ 65.89.18.160:/home/ftp/RePEc/remo" to run every 15 minutes.
Once a day is enough, 10pm should be good. On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Christian Zimmermann < zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
Which directory on the ideas server should be rsynced to which directory
on the authors server? And how often should these directories be rsynced?
/home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/
It looks like /home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/ contains symbolic links to folders in /home/ftp/pub/RePEc, should I copy over /home/ftp/pub/RePEc/ instead?
You want to copy remo, including contents of symbolic links. There is a corresponding remo directory in the adrepec account.
I've setup "rsync -rLptgoD /home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/ 65.89.18.160:/home/ftp/RePEc/remo" to run every 15 minutes.
done On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Christian Zimmermann < zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
Once a day is enough, 10pm should be good.
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
Which directory on the ideas server should be rsynced to which directory
on
the authors server? And how often should these directories be rsynced?
/home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/
It looks like /home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/ contains symbolic links to folders in /home/ftp/pub/RePEc, should I copy over /home/ftp/pub/RePEc/ instead?
You want to copy remo, including contents of symbolic links. There is a corresponding remo directory in the adrepec account.
I've setup "rsync -rLptgoD /home/ftp/pub/RePEc/remo/ 65.89.18.160:/home/ftp/RePEc/**remo" to run every 15 minutes.
'Christian Zimmermann' writes
Hmm. IDEAS should not have mail. Make sure SPF records are there
Good thinking! For that I need the ip address for the new machine.
for all aliases.
It has to be done on a domain-by-domain basis. I will do it for the authors.repec.org domain. Our SPF is very strict. krichel@trabbi:~$ dig -t txt authors.repec.org | grep ^authors authors.repec.org. 3583 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:128.252.177.195 ip4:137.99.31.70 ip4:89.151.115.234 -all" For the case that somebody makes smtp callback, make sure the machine can receive mail to the sending address. Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org> wrote:
'Christian Zimmermann' writes
Hmm. IDEAS should not have mail. Make sure SPF records are there
Good thinking! For that I need the ip address for the new machine.
65.89.18.160
for all aliases.
It has to be done on a domain-by-domain basis. I will do it for the authors.repec.org domain. Our SPF is very strict.
krichel@trabbi:~$ dig -t txt authors.repec.org | grep ^authors authors.repec.org. 3583 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:128.252.177.195 ip4:137.99.31.70 ip4:89.151.115.234 -all"
For the case that somebody makes smtp callback, make sure the machine can receive mail to the sending address.
we'll need to have Boon setup the mail server to receive mail for whichever addresses you need to send from.
Dan Hayes writes
65.89.18.160
done binder@snefru:~$ dig -t txt authors.repec.org | grep ^authors authors.repec.org. 3600 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:65.89.18.160 ip4:128.252.177.195 ip4:137.99.31.70 ip4:89.151.115.234 -all" Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
I've done all the tests so far for the migration. No problems found. It is ready for migration. The only this is: it looks like the SPF record which includes ip4:65.89.18.160 needs to be added to the DNS records of nebka.stlouisfed.org. Here is what google mail says about the mail that is sent by the new server now (a header added by google to an incomming mail): Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 65.89.18.160 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of aras@nebka.stlouisfed.org) client-ip=65.89.18.160; in simple terms, it checks nebka.stlouisfed.org for the SPF records, rather then authors.repec.org. At least that's my best guess at the interpretation of this header. Please, let us decide on the final move date. Dan suggested to wait until 17-18, which is okay with me. But I'll be leaving on Sep 20 for 10 days (for a vacation). Which is okay if everything is alright, but it would be good to avoid last minute hassles. I'd really like to get this done as soon as possible, simply for psychological reasons: i'd be then capable of moving forward on other RAS/ACIS-tasks. This unfinished migration just hangs in my mind uncleared. Christian and Dan, could you please discuss this? I'm pretty flexible in terms of time, except for the already mentioned vacation. -ivan On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org> wrote:
Dan Hayes writes
65.89.18.160
done
binder@snefru:~$ dig -t txt authors.repec.org | grep ^authors authors.repec.org. 3600 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:65.89.18.160 ip4:128.252.177.195 ip4:137.99.31.70 ip4:89.151.115.234 -all"
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
_______________________________________________ RAS-run mailing list RAS-run@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
Ivan Kurmanov writes
The only this is: it looks like the SPF record which includes ip4:65.89.18.160 needs to be added to the DNS records of nebka.stlouisfed.org. Here is what google mail says about the mail that is sent by the new server now (a header added by google to an incomming mail):
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 65.89.18.160 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of aras@nebka.stlouisfed.org) client-ip=65.89.18.160;
Yes, and there does not appear to be a reverse DNS record for the box, a big no-no with some spam filters krichel@sahure:~$ nslookup 65.89.18.160 Server: 213.133.98.98 Address: 213.133.98.98#53 ** server can't find 160.18.89.65.in-addr.arpa.: NXDOMAIN krichel@sahure:~$ nslookup nebka.stlouisfed.org Server: 213.133.98.98 Address: 213.133.98.98#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: nebka.stlouisfed.org Address: 65.89.18.160 stlouisfed will have to deal with this, not us. Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
The nebka.stlouisfed.org is supposed to bounce through mx1.stlouisfed.orgwhich has all the spf and reverse dns records correct. The issue is the sendmail configuration not sending mail through mx1.stlouisfed.org in route to the internet. I'm working on it, shouldn't be too difficult... On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org> wrote:
Ivan Kurmanov writes
The only this is: it looks like the SPF record which includes ip4:65.89.18.160 needs to be added to the DNS records of nebka.stlouisfed.org. Here is what google mail says about the mail that is sent by the new server now (a header added by google to an incomming mail):
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 65.89.18.160 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of aras@nebka.stlouisfed.org) client-ip=65.89.18.160;
Yes, and there does not appear to be a reverse DNS record for the box, a big no-no with some spam filters
krichel@sahure:~$ nslookup 65.89.18.160 Server: 213.133.98.98 Address: 213.133.98.98#53
** server can't find 160.18.89.65.in-addr.arpa.: NXDOMAIN
krichel@sahure:~$ nslookup nebka.stlouisfed.org Server: 213.133.98.98 Address: 213.133.98.98#53
Non-authoritative answer: Name: nebka.stlouisfed.org Address: 65.89.18.160
stlouisfed will have to deal with this, not us.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
_______________________________________________ RAS-run mailing list RAS-run@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
mail/spf should be working now. On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com> wrote:
The nebka.stlouisfed.org is supposed to bounce through mx1.stlouisfed.orgwhich has all the spf and reverse dns records correct. The issue is the sendmail configuration not sending mail through mx1.stlouisfed.org in route to the internet. I'm working on it, shouldn't be too difficult...
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org>wrote:
Ivan Kurmanov writes
The only this is: it looks like the SPF record which includes ip4:65.89.18.160 needs to be added to the DNS records of nebka.stlouisfed.org. Here is what google mail says about the mail that is sent by the new server now (a header added by google to an incomming mail):
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 65.89.18.160 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of aras@nebka.stlouisfed.org) client-ip=65.89.18.160;
Yes, and there does not appear to be a reverse DNS record for the box, a big no-no with some spam filters
krichel@sahure:~$ nslookup 65.89.18.160 Server: 213.133.98.98 Address: 213.133.98.98#53
** server can't find 160.18.89.65.in-addr.arpa.: NXDOMAIN
krichel@sahure:~$ nslookup nebka.stlouisfed.org Server: 213.133.98.98 Address: 213.133.98.98#53
Non-authoritative answer: Name: nebka.stlouisfed.org Address: 65.89.18.160
stlouisfed will have to deal with this, not us.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
_______________________________________________ RAS-run mailing list RAS-run@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
Dan Hayes writes
The nebka.stlouisfed.org is supposed to bounce through mx1.stlouisfed.orgwhich has all the spf and reverse dns records correct.
I added this to the SPF record binder@snefru:~$ dig mx1.stlouisfed.org | grep ^mx mx1.stlouisfed.org. 300 IN A 65.89.18.25 binder@snefru:~$ dig -t txt authors.repec.org | grep ^authors authors.repec.org. 3600 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:65.89.18.160 ip:65.89.18.25 ip4:128.252.177.195 ip4:137.99.31.70 ip4:89.151.115.234 -all" Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
Please, let us decide on the final move date.
Dan suggested to wait until 17-18, which is okay with me. But I'll be leaving on Sep 20 for 10 days (for a vacation). Which is okay if everything is alright, but it would be good to avoid last minute hassles.
I'd really like to get this done as soon as possible, simply for psychological reasons: i'd be then capable of moving forward on other RAS/ACIS-tasks. This unfinished migration just hangs in my mind uncleared.
Christian and Dan, could you please discuss this?
I'm pretty flexible in terms of time, except for the already mentioned vacation.
I didn't think it was a good idea to move before the holiday weekend, but I'm fine with any other time. I can stay up late, get up early, or work over weekends, whatever needs to be done. Its up to Christian.
Reporting from the Lufthansa lounge in Frankfurt, where I am overlooking three A-380s. They are freaking huge. The mailing takes about 10 days, as I space each mail by 30 seconds. I am waiting for the last pass through the stats by Sune, and then I am ready to mail. I will be away Sept 9 and 16-18. Given this my suggestion is either do it this Tuesday, or then wait for 17-18 (I am less important, and I'll have email access). On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
Please, let us decide on the final move date.
Dan suggested to wait until 17-18, which is okay with me. But I'll be leaving on Sep 20 for 10 days (for a vacation). Which is okay if everything is alright, but it would be good to avoid last minute hassles.
I'd really like to get this done as soon as possible, simply for psychological reasons: i'd be then capable of moving forward on other RAS/ACIS-tasks. This unfinished migration just hangs in my mind uncleared.
Christian and Dan, could you please discuss this?
I'm pretty flexible in terms of time, except for the already mentioned vacation.
I didn't think it was a good idea to move before the holiday weekend, but I'm fine with any other time. I can stay up late, get up early, or work over weekends, whatever needs to be done. Its up to Christian.
-- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
I'm fine with doing it Tuesday, but I'll defer to Ivan. We can't move in the middle of the mailing can we? When does that start? On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Christian Zimmermann < zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
The mailing takes about 10 days, as I space each mail by 30 seconds. I am waiting for the last pass through the stats by Sune, and then I am ready to mail. I will be away Sept 9 and 16-18. Given this my suggestion is either do it this Tuesday, or then wait for 17-18 (I am less important, and I'll have email access).
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
Please, let us decide on the final move date.
Dan suggested to wait until 17-18, which is okay with me. But I'll be leaving on Sep 20 for 10 days (for a vacation). Which is okay if everything is alright, but it would be good to avoid last minute hassles.
I'd really like to get this done as soon as possible, simply for psychological reasons: i'd be then capable of moving forward on other RAS/ACIS-tasks. This unfinished migration just hangs in my mind uncleared.
Christian and Dan, could you please discuss this?
I'm pretty flexible in terms of time, except for the already mentioned vacation.
I didn't think it was a good idea to move before the holiday weekend, but I'm fine with any other time. I can stay up late, get up early, or work over weekends, whatever needs to be done. Its up to Christian.
-- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
Yes, let's do it on nearest Tuesday. Dan please review the migration plan document. Feel free to add details, if you feel like that. We could track the migration itself via the document. And my Skype id is vanyakurmanov. -ivan On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm fine with doing it Tuesday, but I'll defer to Ivan.
We can't move in the middle of the mailing can we? When does that start?
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
The mailing takes about 10 days, as I space each mail by 30 seconds. I am waiting for the last pass through the stats by Sune, and then I am ready to mail. I will be away Sept 9 and 16-18. Given this my suggestion is either do it this Tuesday, or then wait for 17-18 (I am less important, and I'll have email access).
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
Please, let us decide on the final move date.
Dan suggested to wait until 17-18, which is okay with me. But I'll be leaving on Sep 20 for 10 days (for a vacation). Which is okay if everything is alright, but it would be good to avoid last minute hassles.
I'd really like to get this done as soon as possible, simply for psychological reasons: i'd be then capable of moving forward on other RAS/ACIS-tasks. This unfinished migration just hangs in my mind uncleared.
Christian and Dan, could you please discuss this?
I'm pretty flexible in terms of time, except for the already mentioned vacation.
I didn't think it was a good idea to move before the holiday weekend, but I'm fine with any other time. I can stay up late, get up early, or work over weekends, whatever needs to be done. Its up to Christian.
-- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
_______________________________________________ RAS-run mailing list RAS-run@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
After thinking a bit more: maybe we could start migration on Monday -- shutdown the servers, start dumping the database and copying it? Then we could finish it on Tuesday relatively quickly. -i On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, let's do it on nearest Tuesday.
Dan please review the migration plan document. Feel free to add details, if you feel like that. We could track the migration itself via the document. And my Skype id is vanyakurmanov.
-ivan
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm fine with doing it Tuesday, but I'll defer to Ivan.
We can't move in the middle of the mailing can we? When does that start?
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
The mailing takes about 10 days, as I space each mail by 30 seconds. I am waiting for the last pass through the stats by Sune, and then I am ready to mail. I will be away Sept 9 and 16-18. Given this my suggestion is either do it this Tuesday, or then wait for 17-18 (I am less important, and I'll have email access).
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
Please, let us decide on the final move date.
Dan suggested to wait until 17-18, which is okay with me. But I'll be leaving on Sep 20 for 10 days (for a vacation). Which is okay if everything is alright, but it would be good to avoid last minute hassles.
I'd really like to get this done as soon as possible, simply for psychological reasons: i'd be then capable of moving forward on other RAS/ACIS-tasks. This unfinished migration just hangs in my mind uncleared.
Christian and Dan, could you please discuss this?
I'm pretty flexible in terms of time, except for the already mentioned vacation.
I didn't think it was a good idea to move before the holiday weekend, but I'm fine with any other time. I can stay up late, get up early, or work over weekends, whatever needs to be done. Its up to Christian.
-- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
_______________________________________________ RAS-run mailing list RAS-run@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
Ivan Kurmanov writes
After thinking a bit more: maybe we could start migration on Monday -- shutdown the servers, start dumping the database and copying it? Then we could finish it on Tuesday relatively quickly.
On Monday I fly Nsk to NYC. I can't use the Internet at SVO because the screen of my laptop only shows black. You will have to do the DNS job yourself. Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel
I am back from travel. Monday is a holiday here, and Dan had things planned for that day. On Sun, 4 Sep 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
After thinking a bit more: maybe we could start migration on Monday -- shutdown the servers, start dumping the database and copying it? Then we could finish it on Tuesday relatively quickly.
-i
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, let's do it on nearest Tuesday.
Dan please review the migration plan document. Feel free to add details, if you feel like that. We could track the migration itself via the document. And my Skype id is vanyakurmanov.
-ivan
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm fine with doing it Tuesday, but I'll defer to Ivan.
We can't move in the middle of the mailing can we? When does that start?
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
The mailing takes about 10 days, as I space each mail by 30 seconds. I am waiting for the last pass through the stats by Sune, and then I am ready to mail. I will be away Sept 9 and 16-18. Given this my suggestion is either do it this Tuesday, or then wait for 17-18 (I am less important, and I'll have email access).
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
Please, let us decide on the final move date.
Dan suggested to wait until 17-18, which is okay with me. But I'll be leaving on Sep 20 for 10 days (for a vacation). Which is okay if everything is alright, but it would be good to avoid last minute hassles.
I'd really like to get this done as soon as possible, simply for psychological reasons: i'd be then capable of moving forward on other RAS/ACIS-tasks. This unfinished migration just hangs in my mind uncleared.
Christian and Dan, could you please discuss this?
I'm pretty flexible in terms of time, except for the already mentioned vacation.
I didn't think it was a good idea to move before the holiday weekend, but I'm fine with any other time. I can stay up late, get up early, or work over weekends, whatever needs to be done. Its up to Christian.
-- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
_______________________________________________ RAS-run mailing list RAS-run@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
-- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
I have things planned early on Monday. I can start working by 4pm. On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Christian Zimmermann < zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
I am back from travel.
Monday is a holiday here, and Dan had things planned for that day.
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
After thinking a bit more: maybe we could start migration on Monday --
shutdown the servers, start dumping the database and copying it? Then we could finish it on Tuesday relatively quickly.
-i
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, let's do it on nearest Tuesday.
Dan please review the migration plan document. Feel free to add details, if you feel like that. We could track the migration itself via the document. And my Skype id is vanyakurmanov.
-ivan
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm fine with doing it Tuesday, but I'll defer to Ivan.
We can't move in the middle of the mailing can we? When does that start?
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
The mailing takes about 10 days, as I space each mail by 30 seconds. I am waiting for the last pass through the stats by Sune, and then I am ready to mail. I will be away Sept 9 and 16-18. Given this my suggestion is either do it this Tuesday, or then wait for 17-18 (I am less important, and I'll have email access).
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
> Please, let us decide on the final move date. > > Dan suggested to wait until 17-18, which is okay with me. But I'll be > leaving on Sep 20 for 10 days (for a vacation). Which is okay if > everything is alright, but it would be good to avoid last minute > hassles. > > I'd really like to get this done as soon as possible, simply for > psychological reasons: i'd be then capable of moving forward on other > RAS/ACIS-tasks. This unfinished migration just hangs in my mind > uncleared. > > Christian and Dan, could you please discuss this? > > I'm pretty flexible in terms of time, except for the already > mentioned > vacation. > > > I didn't think it was a good idea to move before the holiday weekend, but I'm fine with any other time. I can stay up late, get up early, or work over weekends, whatever needs to be done. Its up to Christian.
-- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
______________________________**_________________ RAS-run mailing list RAS-run@lists.openlib.org http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
-- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
participants (4)
-
'Christian Zimmermann' -
Dan Hayes -
Ivan Kurmanov -
Thomas Krichel