Re: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
I still get no suggestion. But adding another name gives me more, all exact name matches, all with a 'no'
So it looks like the system does not offer suggestions with the last name any more, only exact names, and offers a 'no' for all of them.
Christian, please, test & review -- fixed now.
It still offers only exact names, but with a 'yes'. So I cannot test whether it gives a default 'no' for inexact matches.
Note 1: the 'yes' is not colored. Bug or feature?
this is now fixed. Please test again. I suggest to upgrade to this and collect user feedback -- certainly there are issue we have not noticed. -i
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
I still get no suggestion. But adding another name gives me more, all exact name matches, all with a 'no'
So it looks like the system does not offer suggestions with the last name any more, only exact names, and offers a 'no' for all of them.
Christian, please, test & review -- fixed now.
It still offers only exact names, but with a 'yes'. So I cannot test whether it gives a default 'no' for inexact matches.
Note 1: the 'yes' is not colored. Bug or feature?
this is now fixed. Please test again.
I am still not able to generate a 'no', as the system only displays exact name variations.
I suggest to upgrade to this and collect user feedback -- certainly there are issue we have not noticed.
-i
-- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
I am still not able to generate a 'no', as the system only displays exact name variations.
Because all items that could be offered to you as the surname-only matches were in your refused list. I've removed most items from your refused list. Now, if you enter and check, you'll see a few of the inexact matches, offered with No by default. But I now see some mangled characters (Unicode), and that's something I need to investigate. -ivan
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
I am still not able to generate a 'no', as the system only displays exact name variations.
Because all items that could be offered to you as the surname-only matches were in your refused list. I've removed most items from your refused list. Now, if you enter and check, you'll see a few of the inexact matches, offered with No by default.
That is odd, because I did not have any refused items for "Ana Cavajal"... But I see it works fine now. I see now a button "refuse all undecided options". Why that, there is no undecided item to have.
But I now see some mangled characters (Unicode), and that's something I need to investigate.
That is most likely an issue with the relevant RePEc archive.
-ivan
-- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
You did not have any refused items for that name, no. But additional name variations could not generate inexact matches right now. Only your last name could. The inexact search for name variations is only done in APU, which is disabled. If I enable APU now, it may start sending out various emails to actual unsuspecting users. I'll check that refuse button. I think we simply do not need it now. -Ivan On 26.11.2011, at 22:30, "'Christian Zimmermann'" <zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann@stlouisfed.org> wrote:
I am still not able to generate a 'no', as the system only displays exact name variations.
Because all items that could be offered to you as the surname-only matches were in your refused list. I've removed most items from your refused list. Now, if you enter and check, you'll see a few of the inexact matches, offered with No by default.
That is odd, because I did not have any refused items for "Ana Cavajal"... But I see it works fine now.
I see now a button "refuse all undecided options". Why that, there is no undecided item to have.
But I now see some mangled characters (Unicode), and that's something I need to investigate.
That is most likely an issue with the relevant RePEc archive.
-ivan
-- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
participants (2)
-
'Christian Zimmermann' -
Ivan Kurmanov