Christian Zimmermann writes
> I was rather under the impression that CitEc was not removing deleted
> items.
CitEc did remove them, but the data files were not removed on
nebka. This should be now fixed. I am grateful to JMBC for
pointing this out.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
skype: thomaskrichel
Jose Manuel Barrueco writes
>
> I've been looking at the possible causes of discrepancy between CitEc
> and RAS. May be a reason is how RAS deals with deleted handles. In
> today's log of data interchange RAS -> CitEc, we have this citation
> added by an author:
>
> citing paper: repec:bis:bisbpc:22-15
> citing reference: hsHKhhcrKCx1Wmzw5GLqng
> cited paper: repec:jae:japmet:v:16:y:2001:i:4:p:487-520
>
> Such citation seems to be correct in RAS but hasn't been added to
> CitEc because the citing reference doesn't exist there. In fact the
> citing paper doesn't exist too (neither in IDEAS), it was deleted time
> ago.
>
> The question is, how deals RAS with deleted items (references,
> papers, citations.)?
I don't know. I have not worked with the citation stuff. I am
at the moment working with another troublesome issue in ACIS.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
skype: thomaskrichel
