September 2011 - RAS-run

Re: [RAS] Google Analytics
by Thomas Krichel 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Ivan Kurmanov writes > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel(a)openlib.org> wrote: > > > > Ivan Kurmanov writes > > > >> For now, yes, a change to ~/acis/presentation/ras/page.xsl has done > >> the job (i've shifted the GA snippet to just above the </body> tag). > > > > Can you post this somewhere? > > Post what? The changed page.xsl Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 skype: thomaskrichel

1 0

Google Analytics
by 'Christian Zimmermann' 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

We use here Google Analytics to understand better who is using the services. I have added the relevant script to presentation/page.xsl so that is appears at the bottom of every page. But it does not, I guess because it needs to be sourced. How is that done, short of restarting the server? -- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

3 5

RAS migration to St. Louis
by Ivan Kurmanov 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Hi, RAS is now accepting requests on the new host. Some files are still being transfered. None of the cronjobs have been enabled yet, and the update daemon is not running yet. I am to finish all this within the next 8 hours or so. http://authors.repec.org/ the old nebka also had an FTP service to serve RePEc:per archive files (/home/ftp/RePEc/per/) to the world (and RePEc). It has not been transfered yet and that's up to Dan. -ivan

3 5

montly mailing to start
by 'Christian Zimmermann' 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

As things are looking good, I have started the mailing. Editors and maintainers first, authors will soon get it. We'll see how the machine withstands the load. -- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

1 0

Re: [RAS] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
by 'Christian Zimmermann' 04 Sep '11

04 Sep '11

we got this error message. It is regarding the SPF record for the *new* machine. On Sun, 4 Sep 2011, Mail Delivery System wrote: > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: > > lromero(a)uma.es > SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<lromero(a)uma.es>: > host correoe1.uma.es [150.214.47.230]: 550 5.7.1 <aras(a)authors.repec.org>: > Sender address rejected: QUEUE_ID="" SPF Reports: > 'SPF Permanent Error: Unknown mechanism found: > ip:65.89.18.25' > > ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------ > > Return-path: <aras(a)authors.repec.org> > Received: from aras by nebka.uconn.edu with local (Exim 4.69) > (envelope-from <aras(a)authors.repec.org>) > id 1R07PE-0001aL-FF > for lromero(a)uma.es; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 03:46:16 -0400 > Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit > Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > From: "RePEc Author Service" <authors(a)repec.org> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Subject: [RePEc] automatic research profile update > To: "Laura Romero" <lromero(a)uma.es> > Message-Id: <E1R07PE-0001aL-FF(a)nebka.uconn.edu> > Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 03:46:16 -0400 > X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated> > X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: aras(a)authors.repec.org > X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on nebka.uconn.edu) SAEximRunCond expanded to false > > Dear Laura Romero, > > This is an automatic message from RePEc Author Service. You don't need to > reply. > > We ran an automatic search on our documents database for your name > variations and email address and found these works, which you might have > authored: > > * Prices versus Exams as Strategic Instruments for Competing Universities > paper by del Rey, Elena & Romero, Laura > http://ideas.repec.org/p/udg/wpeudg/012.html > > * Competition between public and private universities: quality, prices and > exams. > paper by Romero, Laura & Rey, Elena del > http://ideas.repec.org/p/ner/carlos/infohdl10016-329.html > > If any of these documents is yours, you can add it to your profile on the > research profile suggestions page: > http://authors.repec.org/research/autosuggest > > BTW, you still have 164 other documents which were found earlier but > still wait for your decision. See them on your Research profile's > automatic search suggestions page. > > If necessary, review and change your preferences with regard to automatic > research profile update at: > http://authors.repec.org/research/autoupdate > > > --- > > The message was automatically generated by RePEc Author Service. > > http://authors.repec.org/ > -- Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL! Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

3 4

Re: [RAS] [ACIS-tech] Migration Help
by Ivan Kurmanov 04 Sep '11

04 Sep '11

Dan, The new machine needs to share the RePEc data files with the Ideas server. Have you done anything for that? Sshfs maybe? Also, did you set up the mailing server there? I'm thinking, maybe we could even do the last checks tomorrow and migrate on Thursday... -ivan On Aug 30, 2011 8:27 PM, "Dan Hayes" <dhayes501(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I'm fine waiting until Sept 10-11. It will likely take more downtime > though, it took quite a while to dump the database (less than an hour though > I think), and then it took several hours to transfer it here. Then it took > 8+ hours to load it on the machine here. > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > It looks like it will take editing /etc/hosts to access the web >> interface. >> > Set authors.repec.org to 65.89.18.160. >> > >> > Also, the Affiliations section appears to be working fine now. >> >> I witness. >> >> Which means the Storable strings that were written (with nfreeze) on >> the old nebka are readable on the new one, and we do not need any >> other serialization changes at the moment. >> >> >> >>> Dan, did you measure or record the time it took to restore the >> database? >> >> It took a solid 8 hours. I didn't time it exactly though. I watched >> the >> >> size of /var/lib/mysql and it grew to over 35G, acis is 32G and rdb is >> 4.2G >> >> Then it looks like we should plan for at least 10-12 hours of downtime >> of the service for the final migration. >> >> From the point of view of the least user experience damage (and brand >> damage), it would be great to do the migration over the weekend. But >> the nearest weekend (3-4 Sep) i'm occupied except at night, when I'd >> like to have some sleep. The weekend after (10-11 Sep) i'm available. >> >> Or we can ignore the weekends and plan the transition on a business >> day. I guess Dan will do the large part of the work again, so his >> availability is key here. I'm pretty flexible at the moment. >> >> >> And of course, there's more tests and checks to be done. >> >> -i >> >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> It took a solid 8 hours. I didn't time it exactly though. I watched >> the >> >> size of /var/lib/mysql and it grew to over 35G, acis is 32G and rdb is >> 4.2G >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Dan, did you measure or record the time it took to restore the >> database? >> >>> >> >>> -ivan >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> > The SQL database has been loaded, and it appears to be running >> >>> > properly. >> >>> > You can test it at 65.89.18.160 or at http://nebka.stlouisfed.org. >> >>> > >> >>> > Did I not need to run the updareq commands again? It appears to be >> >>> > working >> >>> > without me needing to do anything else. >> >>> > >> >>> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501(a)gmail.com> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> FYI >> >>> >> >> >>> >> I rsynced the files Saturday afternoon, and dumped the sql database >> >>> >> then >> >>> >> as well. I transferred the db backup on Sunday, and I'm now >> restoring >> >>> >> the >> >>> >> sql databases on the STL server. It looks like its going to take a >> >>> >> while. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Thomas Krichel < >> krichel(a)openlib.org> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Dan Hayes writes >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > So the reason is that its faster than MySQL for what its being >> used >> >>> >>> > for? >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Yes. At least we think so. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Kindly send me an ssh public key to give you access to the test >> >>> >>> server. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Cheers, >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel >> >>> >>> http://authorprofile.org/pkr1 >> >>> >>> skype: thomaskrichel >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >>> ACIS-tech mailing list >> >>> >>> ACIS-tech(a)lists.openlib.org >> >>> >>> http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> > ACIS-tech mailing list >> >>> > ACIS-tech(a)lists.openlib.org >> >>> > http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> ACIS-tech mailing list >> >>> ACIS-tech(a)lists.openlib.org >> >>> http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ACIS-tech mailing list >> > ACIS-tech(a)lists.openlib.org >> > http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ACIS-tech mailing list >> ACIS-tech(a)lists.openlib.org >> http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/acis-tech >>

4 26

Account damaged (fwd)
by 'Christian Zimmermann' 03 Sep '11

03 Sep '11

I do not have the time to look into this (need to work on LogEc then fly back home). Can someone look into this? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:37:52 +0200 From: Davide ticchi <davide.ticchi(a)imtlucca.it> To: authors(a)repec.org Cc: davide.ticchi(a)uniurb.it Subject: Account damaged My name is Davide Ticchi. I just changed my email address and affiliation (it is now IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca and the new email is davide.ticchi(a)imtlucca.it) My previous affiliation was University of Urbino and email davide.ticchi(a)uniurb.it I cannot log in anymnore in the system and I get the message reported below. Can you restore my account with the new data? Thanks very much. Best Davide Ticchi Request forgotten password Error: Your account record in the system is damaged. Please notify system administrator. He should be able to restore it. We will send you the password reminder by email. If you no longer have access to your email, contact administrator.

3 2